Skip to main content
Question

Accounting for Viral Posts in Reporting

  • March 18, 2026
  • 6 replies
  • 56 views

Hi everyone! I work for a local municipality and help oversee the strategy for 20+ social media accounts across different departments.

Each month, I report to our executive team on the previous month’s top‑performing posts. Recently, they’ve asked for more context, specifically average impressions per post, average clicks, average shares, and so on.

Here’s where I’m stuck: How do you account for viral or unusually high‑performing posts when reporting through Sprout Social? I know I can exclude posts using tags, but I’m trying to figure out the best way to define what counts as “viral” so I can set a consistent baseline.

Our accounts vary a lot, which makes this tricky. For example:

  • In 2026, our Police Department had 16 Facebook posts with 300K+ views and 27 with 200K+ views out of 367 total posts.

  • Meanwhile, our City Hall account only had two posts above 200K views out of 194 total, but one of those hit 2.4M views.

My goal is to exclude anything that is clearly out of the ordinary so our averages aren’t skewed, but with so many different account types and audiences, it’s hard to determine what “out of the ordinary” actually means. I’m also trying to build a definition that won’t require a ton of manual work each month, so a method that is easy to repeat would be ideal.

6 replies

Max Pete
Community Manager
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Community Manager
  • March 19, 2026

Great question ​@lauren.oxford! Tagging a few folks here who might be able to share their insights. 

@Katy4Riskonnect, ​@becca.alexander, ​@jaxn.engstrom, ​@tori.zito, and ​@matt.pearsall 


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Level 2
  • March 19, 2026

I only do quarterly reporting, so usually there’s something that spiked each quarter. As part of the reporting, I showcase the top 3 posts per platform and their metrics, and the overall platform metrics. If 1-2 of the top 3 posts went really viral, I’ll add the #4-5 top posts so we can get a better picture of baseline posts compared to the rare ones that really took off.

The more you do it I imagine the better idea you’d have of how a “normal” post performs. I have a general idea of how many impressions I expect for each post, so I can easily see when a post performs really poorly or really well. You could pull the numbers for the past year (with or without the spiked posts) to get those average numbers you baseline against. Personally, some posts are flops, so it usually balances out a little.

As for monthly reports, if it’s only 1-2 per month, you could give the platform metrics with and without those viral posts. Or, if it’s really happening every month, just include it and have a blurb somewhere that explains why the data is skewed this month and that data isn’t always linear. Luckily for me, my leadership doesn’t care too much about numbers in comparison to past periods.


  • Author
  • Level 1
  • March 19, 2026

Thanks for sharing, Tori!


julia.gross
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Level 2
  • March 20, 2026

I always add two annotations at the end of each report. One for insights from this month and one for next steps. This gives me a chance to call out things like viral posts positively or explain “coming down from that reel last month...” as a way of explaining big jumps or dips. I often include “this is great to see, but it’s likely we’ll see a dip next month as the moment cools off” ahead of that actual cool-off occurring.


jaxn.engstrom
Forum|alt.badge.img+3

Hey ​@lauren.oxford, great question and awesome job on those viral posts!

The same as ​@tori.zito, I only do quarterly reporting. In my experience presenting to executive teams, they tend to care most about high-level trends rather than post-level details. When viral posts happen, your average engagement per post is naturally going to increase.

I would include a clear callout noting the impact of those viral posts so expectations are set appropriately, but I wouldn’t exclude them from the numbers. There’s no real benefit to removing strong-performing content from the averages they’re asking for.

Like others mentioned, it’s still smart to look beyond the viral posts and evaluate how your other content is performing to better gauge your overall strategy. That level of granularity is useful for marketers, even if it’s not what exec teams want to see. If it were me, I’d keep the viral posts in the averages and simply add context about a few posts that performed exceptionally well that month or quarter.

Hope that helps!


Thanks for your help, Jaxn!